Geometry · Unit 3
Use the converses of corresponding, alternate interior, alternate exterior, and consecutive interior angles.
Jump to section:
Converses
To prove two lines parallel, show one of these:
corresponding angles congruent, or
alternate interior angles congruent, or
alternate exterior angles congruent, or
consecutive interior angles supplementary.
Example: if corresponding angles are both 62°, the lines are parallel.
You may need a linear pair first
A given angle might not be the one you compare. Find its supplement or its vertical angle, then compare.
Example: a 130° angle has a 50° linear-pair partner. If the other line has a 50° corresponding angle, the lines are parallel.
Three lines
Check each pair. Maybe a ∥ b, or only a ∥ c, or none.
When they are not parallel
If corresponding angles are 70° and 75°, the converse does not apply. Do not claim the lines are parallel.
Two lines, one clear pair.
Corresponding angles are congruent.
Converse of corresponding angles: r ∥ s.
Answer: yes; corresponding angles converse
115 + 65 = 180, so the consecutive interior angles are supplementary.
Converse of consecutive interior angles: r ∥ s.
Answer: yes; consecutive interior converse
Alternate interior angles are congruent.
r ∥ s by the alternate interior converse.
Answer: yes; alternate interior converse
70 ≠ 75, so corresponding angles are not congruent.
You cannot conclude that the lines are parallel.
Answer: no
Alternate exterior angles are congruent.
r ∥ s.
Answer: yes; alternate exterior converse
Yes. Each pair of corresponding angles is 90°.
Two lines perpendicular to the same line are parallel.
Answer: yes
Find a hidden congruent or supplementary pair first.
∠2 and ∠4 are vertical, so m∠4 = 125°.
∠4 and ∠5 are consecutive interior.
125 + 55 = 180, so they are supplementary.
a ∥ b by the consecutive interior converse.
Answer: a ∥ b; consecutive interior converse
Corresponding angles at a and b are congruent.
a ∥ b.
No information compares c, so you cannot prove a line through c is parallel.
Answer: a ∥ b only
88 + 92 = 180, so they are supplementary.
r ∥ s.
Answer: yes
p ∥ q by alternate interior converse.
q is not parallel to r: corresponding angles 61 and 70 are not congruent.
So only p ∥ q.
Answer: only p ∥ q
118 ≠ 62, so corresponding angles are not congruent.
118 + 62 = 180, but corresponding angles need to be congruent, not supplementary.
Do not conclude that the lines are parallel from this pair.
Answer: no
55 + 125 = 180, so consecutive interior angles for a and c are supplementary.
a ∥ c.
No marked pair involves b.
Answer: a ∥ c
Three lines, mixed clues, or not enough information.
Linear pair at c: 180 − 122 = 58°.
That 58° sits in the upper-left corner at c.
The marked angle at b is also 58° in the upper-left corner.
Corresponding angles are congruent.
b ∥ c by the corresponding angles converse.
Answer: b ∥ c; corresponding angles converse
Vertical angles are always congruent, even when the lines are not parallel.
That pair gives no information about whether the two lines are parallel.
No.
Answer: no
a ∥ b (corresponding converse).
64 + 116 = 180, so b ∥ c (consecutive interior converse).
Parallel is transitive: a ∥ c too.
All three are parallel.
Answer: a ∥ b ∥ c
Linear pair with 140° is 40°.
Corresponding would need 50 = 40.
50 ≠ 40, so corresponding angles are not congruent.
You cannot prove the lines parallel.
Answer: none
Either transversal’s corresponding pair is enough.
p ∥ q.
The second pair matches because the lines are already parallel; it is consistent, not a second conclusion.
Answer: p ∥ q
Set them equal to use the converse: 3x + 10 = 5x − 6.
10 + 6 = 5x − 3x
16 = 2x
x = 8
Both angles equal 3(8) + 10 = 34°.
Alternate interior angles are congruent, so a ∥ b.
Answer: x = 8; a ∥ b
Need help proving two lines are parallel?
Book a Session with Amy